Cases 1 - 10 of 16
ARAYA v. MITCHELL
as 1:2023cv00985
Plaintiff:
ISAAK SIMON ARAYA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, JUSTIN R. MITCHELL and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
AULD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2022cv03129
Plaintiff:
Ms. ANNE-MARIE AULD and ANNE-MARIE AULD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
FLING v. MARTIN et al
as 1:2019cv00693
Defendant:
DANIEL GRANT, FREDERICO BYNOE, MEGAN J. BRENNAN and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL FLING
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 8101
BELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2018cv00738
Plaintiff:
YOLANDA BELL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and U.S. ATTORNEYS OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
JONES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2017cv01496
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY JONES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
ORAVIS et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT et al
as 1:2015cv01929
Plaintiff:
JOHN ORAVIS and HECTOR PEREZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT and KEYPOINT GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Ronald Smith v. USA, et al
as 15-5238
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ronald M. Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, Lawrence O. Anyaso and Corey Rogers
SMITH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2014cv02052
Plaintiff:
JANEL N. SMITH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
SMITH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2012cv01679
Plaintiff:
RONALD M. SMITH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, COREY ROGERS and LAWRENCE O. ANYASO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
MORAN v. UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE
as 1:2012cv01561
Plaintiff:
LUANNE LYNN MORAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE
Cause Of Action: Violation of Congressional Accountability Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
