Motor Vehicle Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
CHRISTIAN et al v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC et al
as 1:2024cv00304
Plaintiff: JESUS M CHRISTIAN, CAMILA ALEXIA SELMAN and JESUS M. CHRISTIAN
Defendant: UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC, RASIER, LLC, KHALINMANDAKH ICHINKHOROL and others
Cross Defendant: PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY and FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
DANA JOHNSON v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv00821
Defendant: CRAIG CHERVERT LONG, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and RASIER, LLC
Plaintiff: DANA JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. FLORES
as 1:2018cv00952
Plaintiff: INGRID JOHNSON
Defendant: JAVIER FLORES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
JOHNSON-BATTLE et al v. SWIFT TRANSPORTATION CO. ARIZONA, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00426
Plaintiff: SHERRY DENISE JOHNSON-BATTLE and MICHAEL BATTLE
Defendant: SWIFT TRANSPORTATION CO. ARIZONA, LLC and NICHOLAS RANDALL WEGMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. D.C. METRO TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv01721
Plaintiff: WILBUR JOHNSON
Defendant: D.C. METRO TRANSIT AUTHORITY and SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTE ARCHIVES MUSEUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2016cv00023
Plaintiff: SHIRLEY ANN JOHNSON
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2013cv00107
Plaintiff: JAMES H. JOHNSON
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
HODGES et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2007cv02091
Plaintiff: GREER HODGES, CELESTE TERRILL and SHANTALLE JOHNSON
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, JAMES BERNARDO FRAZIER, JR. and CHARLES BERNARD PERRY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?