Cases 1 - 10 of 104
SWEENEY v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SWEENEY
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
HENDERSON v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
KATHY HENDERSON
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY and MEDSTAR WASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER
CARY v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2023cv03469
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL CARY
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 Personal Injury
EDEKE v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2023cv02589
Plaintiff:
JULIANA EDEKE
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
DARDEN v. PEARSON et al
as 1:2023cv02185
Plaintiff:
TARIA DASHAWN DARDEN
Defendant:
LILLIAN GLADYS PEARSON and WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
MCCOYIE v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2023cv02064
Plaintiff:
HARVEY MCCOYIE
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
A.V. et al v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2023cv01184
Plaintiff:
A.V., IVANA USKOKOVIC and PETER VANDERBERG
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
MABREY v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2023cv00569
Plaintiff:
THOMAS MABREY and THOMAS A. MABREY
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY and RANDY CLARKE
MONTGOMERY v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2023cv00463
Plaintiff:
REBECCA MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Cameroon Whiteru, et al v. WMATA
as 22-7154
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cameroon Whiteru, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Okiemute C. Whiteru and Agnes Whiteru
Defendant / Appellee:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
