Cases 91 - 100 of 297
BEDFORD COUNTY, VIRGINIA v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2011cv00499
Plaintiff:
BEDFORD COUNTY, VIRGINIA
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER and THOMAS E. PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
CITY OF BEDFORD, VIRGINIA v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2011cv00473
Plaintiff:
CITY OF BEDFORD, VIRGINIA
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER and THOMAS E. PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
JEFFERSON COUNTY DRAINAGE DISTRICT NO. 7 v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2011cv00461
Plaintiff:
JEFFERSON COUNTY DRAINAGE DISTRICT NO. 7
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER and THOMAS E. PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Stephen Laroque, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 10-5433
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Stephen Laroque, Anthony Cuomo, John Nix and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of the United States
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
Joseph M. Tyson, W. J. Best, Sr., A. Offord Carmichael, Jr. and others
SCHONBERG v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
as 1:2010cv02040
Plaintiff:
STEVE SCHONBERG
Defendant:
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431 Fed. Election Commission: Failure Enforce C
STATE OF GEORGIA v. HOLDER
as 1:2010cv01970
Plaintiff:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
BLUMAN et al v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
as 1:2010cv01766
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN BLUMAN and ASENATH STEIMAN
Defendant:
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 437
Estate of Yaron and Efra Ungar v. Palestinian Authority
as 10-5322
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Estate Of Yaron Ungar And Efrat Ungar
Defendant - Appellee:
Palestinian Authority
Interested Party - Appellee:
Wachovia Bank, (The Banks), Democracy Council, League Of Arab States and others
CITY OF SANDY SPRINGS v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2010cv01502
Plaintiff:
CITY OF SANDY SPRINGS
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER and THOMAS E. PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
LITTLE v. KING et al
as 1:2010cv01216
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN LITTLE
Defendant:
TROY KING and ERIC HOLDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
