Cases 1 - 10 of 11
CITY OF FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2013cv00201
Plaintiff:
CITY OF FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA
Defendant:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR. and THOMAS E. PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Voting Rights Act
CITY OF WHEATLAND, CALIFORNIA v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2013cv00054
Plaintiff:
CITY OF WHEATLAND, CALIFORNIA
Defendant:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR. and THOMAS E. PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Voting Rights Act
CITY OF PINSON, ALABAMA v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2012cv00255
Plaintiff:
CITY OF PINSON, ALABAMA
Defendant:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR. and THOMAS E. PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
JAMES CITY COUNTY, VIRGINIA v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2011cv01425
Plaintiff:
JAMES CITY COUNTY, VIRGINIA
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER and THOMAS PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
CITY OF WILLIAMSBURG, VIRGINIA v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2011cv01415
Plaintiff:
CITY OF WILLIAMSBURG, VIRGINIA
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER and THOMAS PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
CITY OF MANASSAS PARK, VIRGINIA v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2011cv00749
Plaintiff:
CITY OF MANASSAS PARK, VIRGINIA
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER and THOMAS E. PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
CITY OF BEDFORD, VIRGINIA v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2011cv00473
Plaintiff:
CITY OF BEDFORD, VIRGINIA
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER and THOMAS E. PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
CITY OF SANDY SPRINGS v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2010cv01502
Plaintiff:
CITY OF SANDY SPRINGS
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER and THOMAS E. PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
CITY OF KINGS MOUNTAIN v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2010cv01153
Plaintiff:
CITY OF KINGS MOUNTAIN
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER and THOMAS A. PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Christopher Strunk v. Department of Commerce, et al
as 10-5082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Christopher Earl Strunk, also known as Chris
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, Carlos Gutierrez, Secretary of Commerce, City of New York, (NYC) and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
