Cases 11 - 20 of 2,610
Martin Akerman v. Sherri Doiron
as 23-5230
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Martin Akerman
Defendant / Appellee:
Sherri Doiron
Ammar Al-Baluchi v. Lloyd Austin III
as 23-5251
Petitioner / Appellant:
Ammar Al-Baluchi, also known as Ali Abdul Aziz Ali
Respondent / Appellee:
Robert M. Gates, Secretary of Defense, Lloyd J. Austin, III, Secretary of Defense, Commander, Joint Task Force, GTMO and others
MORGAN v. BIDEN
as 1:2023cv03122
Petitioner:
DAVID BRIAN MORGAN
Respondent:
JOE BIDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FLEMING v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv03203
Petitioner:
STEPHANIE LYNN FLEMING
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FCI DANBURY and BALTIMORE RRM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MOQADDEM v. BURGHARDT et al
as 1:2023cv03148
Petitioner:
MAHA MOQADDEM
Respondent:
JOSEPH BURGHARDT and SUPERIOR STATE COURT OF CALIFORNIA AIRPORT COURTHOUSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HERNANDEZ ZAPATA
as 1:2023cv03320
Petitioner:
JUAN J. HERNANDEZ ZAPATA
Respondent:
WILLIAMSBURG CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Anthony Braxton v. Superior Court for the District of Columbia
as 23-7122
Petitioner / Appellant:
Anthony Braxton
Defendant / Appellee:
Superior Court for the District of Columbia
Raymond Roseboro v. Warden
as 23-5247
Petitioner / Appellant:
Raymond R. Roseboro
Respondent / Appellee:
Warden, USP Yazoo City
Cochise Shakur v. Warden
as 23-5258
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cochise Amari Shakur
Defendant / Appellee:
Warden, FCI Petersburg
DELISIO v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2023cv03351
Plaintiff:
RONALD MICHAEL DELISIO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, STATE OF OHIO, OFFICE OF THE BISHOP - DIOCESE OF CLEVELAND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
