Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Simon Banks v. Devon Brown
as 09-7090
Petitioner - Appellant:
Simon Banks
Respondent - Appellee:
Devon Brown, Director of the DC Department of Corrections
BANKS v. BROWN
as 1:2009cv01208
Petitioner:
SIMON BANKS
Respondent:
DEVON BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BROWN v. LEVI
as 1:2009cv01207
Petitioner:
KEVIN ARTHUR BROWN
Respondent:
TROY LEVI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richard Campbell v. United States Parole Commissio, et al
as 08-5104
Petitioner - Appellant:
Richard Campbell
Respondent - Appellee:
United States Parole Commission and Devon Brown, DC Detention Facility Director
BEY v. REILLY et al
as 1:2008cv00311
Plaintiff:
MELVIN CROSBY BEY
Defendant:
EDWARD F. REILLY, JR., DEVON BROWN and JOHN CAULFIELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MAGEE v. BROWN et al
as 1:2007cv02176
Petitioner:
RUCHELL CINQUE MAGEE
Respondent:
JERRY BROWN, ORRIN HATCH, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CAMPBELL v. US PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2007cv02013
Petitioner:
RICHARD CAMPBELL
Respondent:
US PAROLE COMMISSION and DEVON BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BROWN v. GEREN
as 1:2007cv01250
Petitioner:
PETER D. BROWN
Respondent:
PETE GEREN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BROWN v. CAULFIELD
as 1:2007cv00724
Petitioner:
RALPH BROWN
Defendant:
JOHN CAULFIELD
Movant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BROWN v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2007cv00617
Petitioner:
RAYMOND BROWN
Respondent:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION and D.C. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
