Cases 21 - 30 of 30
DUNWOODY v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2008cv00885
Petitioner:
WILLIAM T. DUNWOODY
Respondent:
HARLEY LAPPIN and FREDRICK MENIFEE
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
KELLY v. LAPPIN
as 1:2008cv00606
Petitioner:
CINEUS KELLY
Respondent:
HARLEY LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
POWELL v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2008cv00379
Petitioner:
LARRY POWELL
Respondent:
HARLEY LAPPIN, R. E. HOLT, DREW and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HAMILTON v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2007cv01692
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and HARLEY LAPPIN
Petitioner:
DAVID L. HAMILTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
KUON v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2007cv01700
Petitioner:
BILLY KUON
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and HARLEY LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
VALLIERE v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2007cv01680
Petitioner:
DEMOND S. VALLIERE
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALES and HARLEY LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FLORES v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2007cv01609
Petitioner:
RUBEN FLORES
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALES and HARLEY LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WALLACE v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2007cv01536
Petitioner:
JOEL L. WALLACE
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALES and HARLEY LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MARTIN v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2007cv01385
Petitioner:
ANTHONY BRIAN MARTIN
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALES and HARLEY LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SMITH v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2007cv00941
Petitioner:
RENARD DEWAYNE SMITH
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALES, HARLEY LAPPIN and FRANCISCO QUINTANA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
