General Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 2,611
BRYANT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv02224
Petitioner: RONNIE LEON BRYANT
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Frank Garcia v. USA, et al
as 23-5151
Plaintiff / Appellant: Frank Nunez Garcia
Defendant / Appellee: United States of America, Phoenix Police Department and Jim Ahearn, FBI, Special Agent In-Charge
Lee Crayton v. Michael Feazell, et al
as 23-7081
Petitioner / Appellant: Lee Darrell Crayton
Respondent / Appellee: Michael Feazell, Senior: Warden, Kody Schur, Asst. Warden and Kamilah Coger, Asst. Warden
BERRY v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
as 1:2023cv01814
Petitioner: DUANE LETROY BERRY
Respondent: UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BRAXTON v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01717
Petitioner: ANTHONY BRAXTON
Respondent: SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BRAXTON v. SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2023cv01718
Petitioner: ANTHONY BRAXTON
Defendant: SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David Morgan v. USA
as 23-5112
Plaintiff / Appellant: David Brian Morgan
Defendant / Appellee: United States of America
Tavarres Henderson v. Joseph Biden, Jr.
as 23-5106
Petitioner / Appellant: Tavarres Henderson
Respondent / Appellee: Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Mr., President
Peter Gakuba v. D.C. Office of Attorney General
as 23-7055
Petitioner / Appellant: Peter Gakuba
Respondent / Appellee: D.C. Office of Attorney General
Peter Gakuba v. D.C. Office of Attorney General
as 23-7053
Petitioner / Appellant: Peter Gakuba
Respondent / Appellee: D.C. Office of Attorney General

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?