Cases 41 - 50 of 121
HAMLETT v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2013cv01709
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY HAMLETT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GARVIN v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2013cv02017
Petitioner:
NATHANIEL ROBERT GARVIN, SR.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JACKSON v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2013cv01936
Petitioner:
DARRELL JOSEPH JACKSON, JR.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HERNDON v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2013cv01929
Petitioner:
JOHN K. HERNDON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JACKSON-BEY v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2013cv01815
Petitioner:
LOUIS R. JACKSON-BEY, JR.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CUTCHIN v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2013cv01814
Petitioner:
DEMANNE CUTCHIN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
COLEY v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2013cv01515
Petitioner:
RONNIE LAMONT COLEY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and ISAAC FULWOOD, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Frank Johnson v. Isaac Johnston, et al
as 13-5299
Petitioner - Appellant:
Frank Johnson
Respondent - Appellee:
Isaac Johnston, Warden and United States Parole Commission
Clifford Jackson v. Carolyn Cross, et al
as 13-5229
Petitioner - Appellant:
Clifford Jackson
Respondent - Appellee:
Carolyn Cross, Warden, D.C. Jail and United States Parole Commission
RAMSEY, JR. v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2013cv01003
Petitioner:
CHARLES W. RAMSEY, JR.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
