General Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 71 - 80 of 120
BROOKS v. HOGSTEN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv01788
Petitioner: WILLIAM R. BROOKS
Respondent: KAREN F. HOGSTEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2012cv01480
Petitioner: CLARENCE E. WILLIAMS
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ERIC HOLDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
TRUSELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2012cv01300
Petitioner: WILLIAM VAN TRUSELL
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and CATHERINE C. EAGLES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv01206
Petitioner: CLARENCE E. WILLIAMS
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JAMES C. DEVER, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CARRASCOSA v. HAUCK et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00992
Petitioner: MARIA JOSE CARRASCOSA
Respondent: WILLIAM HAUCK and NJ ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ALPINE v. WATHEN et al
as 1:2012cv00681
Petitioner: CHARLES ALPINE
Respondent: R. WATHEN and WILLIAM SUTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HYSELL v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA
as 1:2012cv00579
Plaintiff: DOUGLAS WILLIAM HYSELL
Defendant: STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
EMBREY v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2012cv00117
Plaintiff: WILLIAM J.R. EMBREY
Defendant: CHARLES SAMUELS, JR and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WILLIAMS v. CURLEY
as 1:2011cv02231
Petitioner: TYRONE WILLIAMS
Respondent: MICHAEL CURLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HARBISON v. BECK et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv01900
Plaintiff: PAUL RENFRO HARBISON, JR.
Defendant: DAVID BECK, WILLIAM NEELY and HOWARD SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?