General Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Raymond Roseboro v. Warden
as 23-5247
Petitioner / Appellant: Raymond R. Roseboro
Respondent / Appellee: Warden, USP Yazoo City
ATKINSON v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSIONER et al
as 1:2022cv00253
Petitioner: FREDERICK ATKINSON
Respondent: U.S. PAROLE COMMISSIONER and WARDEN, USP BEAUMONT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
GORBEY v WARDEN
as 1:2021cv01570
Respondent: WARDEN OF USP-LEWISBURG
Petitioner: MICHAEL OWL FEATHER GORBEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
David Graham, Jr. v. FCC Coleman USP II
as 16-5179
Petitioner - Appellant: David Graham, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee: FCC Coleman USP II, WARDEN
GRAHAM v. FCC COLEMAN USP II We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv01567
Petitioner: DAVID GRAHAM, JR.
Respondent: FCC COLEMAN USP II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Andrew Gross, III v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 11-5262
Petitioner - Appellant: Andrew Gross
Respondent - Appellee: Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of the U.S., Harley G. Lappin, Bureau of Prisons Director and Charles L. Lockett, Warden, Terre Haute USP
CRAWFORD v. FCC COLEMAN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv01411
Petitioner: JAMES B. CRAWFORD
Respondent: FCC COLEMAN USP II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BOYD v. WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN -USP II We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00511
Petitioner: PADER R. BOYD
Respondent: WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN -USP II
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Sugarman, Neil Paril v. Pitzer, Percy, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 98-5522
Plaintiff - Appellant: Neil Paris Sugarman
Defendant - Appellee: Percy Pitzer, Warden, USP Beaumont, Wendy J. Roal, Administrator, National Inmate Appeals, J. Rogalsky, Case Manager, USP Beaumont and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?