Cases 101 - 110 of 382
HARRISON v. MALDENADO et al
as 1:2018cv01163
Plaintiff:
CHARLES RANDALL HARRISON
Defendant:
RAUL MALDENADO, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRASAD v. DELTA SIGMA THETA SORORITY, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv01130
Plaintiff:
SUNDARI KARMA PRASAD
Defendant:
DELTA SIGMA THETA SORORITY, INC., BEVERLY EVANS SMITH, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOURSTAR v. GARDEN CITY GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv00966
Plaintiff:
VICTOR CHARLES FOURSTAR, JR.
Defendant:
GARDEN CITY GROUP, INC., JULIA CHAVEZ, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEAVER v. RUSSELL et al
as 1:2018cv00961
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN D. WEAVER
Defendant:
MICHAEL D. RUSSELL, RANDOLPH W. SAWYER, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BENJAMIN v. HICKS et al
as 1:2018cv00864
Plaintiff:
LOPEZ P. BENJAMIN
Defendant:
HICKS, HOYLE, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARBAJAL v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2018cv00523
Plaintiff:
DEAN CARBAJAL
Defendant:
JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR., SONIA SOTOMAYOR, ANTHONY M. KENNEDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BENOIT v. KANE et al
as 1:2018cv00535
Plaintiff:
AUNDEL BENOIT
Defendant:
RICHARD KANE, KATHLEEN KENNEY, J.L. NORWOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASTANEDA v. KANE et al
as 1:2018cv00307
Plaintiff:
CARLOS ROY CASTANEDA
Defendant:
RICHARD KANE, JOSE SANTANA, J.A. TERRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERKINS v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2018cv00175
Plaintiff:
VICTOR B. PERKINS
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., LORETTA LYNCH and JOHN ASHCROFT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRYANT v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2018cv00176
Plaintiff:
RONNIE LEON BRYANT
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GOVERNMENT, METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, SARAH R. BUC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
