Cases 131 - 140 of 4,012
SMITH v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2023cv01296
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ABRAHAM SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN, MIKE PENSE and SECRETARY OF DEFENSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GREESON v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 1:2023cv01254
Plaintiff:
REMBERT D. GREESON
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bobby Grady v. Louise Flanagan
as 23-5097
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bobby Ray Grady
Defendant / Appellee:
Louise W. Flanagan, U.S. District Court Judge
Julian Okeayainneh v. DOJ, et al
as 23-5093
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Julian Okeayainneh
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Director/Chief of Human Resources and United States Attorney General
Joshua Taylor v. United States Department of Justice Executive Off
as 23-5092
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joshua Mark Taylor
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Justice Executive Office for United States Attorneys
David Rudometkin v. Ryan McCarthy
as 23-5088
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David J. Rudometkin
Defendant / Appellee:
Ryan D. McCarthy, in his capacity as the Secretary of the Army
NICOLESCU v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2023cv01119
Plaintiff:
BOGDAN NICOLESCU
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND, M. D. CARAVAJAL, DAVID BREWER and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
BERRY v. UNITED STATES
as 1:2023cv01125
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN BURKE BERRY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YUAN v. UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE
as 1:2023cv01113
Plaintiff:
JIANBIN YUAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GRISSOM v. DEHAAN
as 1:2023cv01087
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE GRISSOM
Defendant:
SUE DEHAAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
