Cases 171 - 180 of 4,014
MOLLER v. TRANSGENDER EXECUTIVE COUNSEL et al
as 1:2023cv00921
Defendant:
TRANSGENDER EXECUTIVE COUNSEL, TEC, IAN CONNERS and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. MOLLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUERTA v. PETERS et al
as 1:2023cv00634
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE GUSTAVO HUERTA
Defendant:
COLETES PETERS, MERRICK GARLAND and MERRICK B. GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAMOS v. UNKNOWN SPECIAL AGENT et al
as 1:2023cv00423
Plaintiff:
JULIO A. RAMOS
Defendant:
UNKNOWN SPECIAL AGENT and UNITED STATES DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. PETERS et al
as 1:2023cv00635
Plaintiff:
TAQUAN WRIGHT
Defendant:
COLETES PETERS, MERRICK GARLAND and MERRICK B. GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montgomery Akers v. Katherine Siereveld
as 23-7026
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant / Appellee:
Katherine Siereveld
WILLIAMS v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2023cv00401
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICES and CHARLOTTE LUCKSTONE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
GARCIA v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL ANTONIO GARCIA
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., BILL CLINTON, BETH GIBSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE et al
as 1:2023cv00346
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE and CHARLOTTE LUCKSTONE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
GRISSOM v. SALAAM
as 1:2023cv00385
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE GRISSOM
Defendant:
BILLIE SALAAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARCIA v BIDEN et al.
as 1:2023cv00472
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL ANTONIO GARCIA
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., BILL CLINTON, BETH GIBSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
