Civil Rights Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 31
BALLARD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2017cv00043
Plaintiff: ALEXANDER P.J. BALLARD
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Prince Jones v. Muriel Bowser, et al
as 16-7141
Plaintiff - Appellant: Prince Jones
Plaintiff - Appellee: Lafayette Dotson, Adonnis Atchinson, Ricky Donaldson and others
Defendant - Appellee: Muriel Bowser, Phil Mendelson, Kennyan Muduffie and others
WARD v. ENGLISH et al
as 1:2016cv02276
Plaintiff: LUCAS LEE WARD
Defendant: DANIEL ENGLISH, MELLETE, M. ANDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES et al v. ATCHINSON et al
as 1:2016cv02142
Plaintiff: PRINCE JONES, LAFAYETTE DOTSON, ADONNIS ATCHINSON and others
Defendant: MURIEL BOWSER, PHIL MENDELSON, KENNYAN MUDUFFIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BALLARD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2016cv02093
Plaintiff: ALEXANDER P.J. BALLARD
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MATTHEWS v. HERMAN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv02084
Plaintiff: ALEXANDER OTIS MATTHEWS
Defendant: ELIZABETH A. HERMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
MATTHEWS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00569
Plaintiff: ALEXANDER OTIS MATTHEWS
Defendant: FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
MATTHEWS v. SAMUELS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv01565
Plaintiff: ALEXANDER OTIS MATTHEWS
Defendant: CHARLES SAMUELS, JR. and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MATTHEWS v. PAUZE
as 1:2014cv00248
Plaintiff: ALEXANDER OTIS MATTHEWS
Defendant: MICHAEL RICHARD PAUZE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALEXANDER v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2014cv00024
Plaintiff: ROBERT ALEXANDER
Defendant: UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?