Cases 21 - 30 of 4,012
Timothy Young v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-5027
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Justice and others
GONZALES v. JONES et al
as 1:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
FRED GONZALES
Defendant:
RASHIDA JONES, MARK THOMPSON, SUZANNE SCOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WITCHARD v. SURAMPUDI et al
as 1:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH WITCHARD
Defendant:
VIJAYA S. SURAMPUDI, MATTHEW H. SOLOMSON, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Victor Hernandez v. DC, et al
as 24-7010
Plaintiff:
Victor Hernandez
Defendant:
District of Columbia, Dove, Individually and Off. Cap., William, Individually and Off. Cap. and others
MOTEN v. METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al.
as 1:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
DOMINIQUE C. MOTEN
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, RANDY GRIFFIN, COMMANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VISCONTI v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
as 1:2024cv00014
Defendant:
MAHA VISCONTI, MAHA EL PINTO-MAQADDEM, LALAMAHA REGRAGUIMOQADEM and others
Plaintiff:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRAXTON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BRAXTON
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
HAIMANIO v. DEKALB COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2023cv03827
Plaintiff:
APOJON PAPA HAIMANIO
Defendant:
DEKALB COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, MONICA PANOSIAN, GREGORY MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VISCONTI v. SEPE et al
as 1:2023cv03829
Plaintiff:
MAHA VISCONTI and MAHA MOQADDEM
Defendant:
LOUIS SEPE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, CENTRAL DISTRICT COURT OF CALIFORNIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
