Cases 21 - 30 of 59
HEINEMAN et al v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2009cv00328
Plaintiff:
DALE SCOTT HEINEMAN and KIRK F. JOHNSON
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY LAPPIN, LINDA SANDERS and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
CROSBY v. ZOLEY et al
as 1:2009cv00284
Plaintiff:
MELVIN CROSBY-BEY
Defendant:
GEORGE C. ZOLEY, HARLEY LAPPIN, GEORGE SNYDER and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CARTER v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2009cv00208
Plaintiff:
JEREMY MARQUISE CARTER
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, MARY MITCHELL and K. CIMOCK
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
DEES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2009cv00206
Plaintiff:
SHANNON DEES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY LAPPIN and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
PATEL v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2009cv00200
Plaintiff:
KAMEL K. PATEL
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS and HARLEY LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
VANDIVERE v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2009cv00176
Plaintiff:
JAMES DOW VANDIVERE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS and HARLEY LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
GEORGACARAKOS v. WATTS et al
as 1:2008cv02147
Plaintiff:
PETER GEORGACARAKOS
Defendant:
HARRELL WATTS, BAXTER and HARLEY LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
BARNES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2008cv02015
Plaintiff:
REGINALD BARNES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY LAPPIN and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
TRANI v. MUKASEY et al
as 1:2008cv01921
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANTHONY TRANI, JR.
Defendant:
MICHAEL MUKASEY, HARLEY LAPPIN, RUTH YANCEY and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
WALL v. BENDER et al
as 1:2008cv01844
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WALL
Defendant:
BENDER, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and HARLEY LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
