Civil Rights Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 91
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2014cv01296
Plaintiff: DERRICK LAVELL WILLIAMS
Defendant: UNITED STATES, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., PROPST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Albert Jones v. USA
as 14-5077
Plaintiff - Appellant: Albert T. Jones, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee: United States of America
Albert Jones, Sr. v. USA
as 14-5070
Plaintiff - Appellant: Albert T. Jones, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee: United States of America
JONES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2014cv00235
Plaintiff: ALBERT T. JONES, SR.
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORTON v. FULWOOD et al
as 1:2014cv00193
Plaintiff: WALTER BERNARD MORTON, JR.
Defendant: ISAAC FULWOOD, STEPHANIE JONES, CORY D. MITCHELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00022
Plaintiff: ALBERT T. JONES, SR.
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torrance Jones v. EOUSA
as 13-5336
Plaintiff - Appellant: Torrance Jones
Defendant - Appellee: Executive Office for United States Attorneys
JONES v. UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICE
as 1:2013cv01167
Plaintiff: TORRANCE JONES
Defendant: UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00780
Plaintiff: JASON JONES
Defendant: UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and ISAAC FULWOOD, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. KIRCHNER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv01334
Plaintiff: ANTOINE JONES
Defendant: STEVE KIRCHNER, JOSEPH SOPATA, STEPHEN NAUGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?