Cases 41 - 50 of 95
SHAH v. HOLDER
as 1:2014cv00283
Plaintiff:
VIVEK SHAH
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATTLETON v. HOLDER
as 1:2014cv00281
Plaintiff:
DAVID EARL WATTLETON
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Ladeairous v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 14-5007
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joseph Michael Ladeairous
Defendant - Appellee:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General and Michael J. Horowitz, United States Inspector General
ACKLES v. UNITED STATES CONGRESS et al
as 1:2013cv01907
Plaintiff:
MONEEK M. ACKLES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CONGRESS, JOHN BOEHNER, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LADEAIROUS v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2013cv01588
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MICHAEL LADEAIROUS
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and MICHAEL HOROWITZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2013cv01198
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS ROBINSON
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and MARK P. LANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donnie Sheffield v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-5217
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Donnie Wayne Sheffield
Defendant - Appellee:
Eric H. Holder, Jr.
Alan Golder v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 13-5211
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Alan William Golder
Defendant - Appellee:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General, Alberto R. Gonzales, United States Attorney General, Patricia Reedy, Assistant Director International Affairs and others
YOUNG v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2013cv01044
Plaintiff:
DAVID M. YOUNG
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY and SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND SAFETY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FULKS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2013cv00938
Plaintiff:
CHADRICK EVAN FULKS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., MICHELE LEONHART and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
