Cases 41 - 50 of 203
HARRIOT v. DOJ et al
as 1:2018cv01587
Defendant:
IRENE JOSEY, RODNEY PRITCHARD, SCARLET A. WILSON and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL OWEN HARRIOT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRASAD v. STYLE WEEKLY MAGAZINE et al
as 1:2018cv01309
Plaintiff:
SUNDARI K. PRASAD
Defendant:
STYLE WEEKLY MAGAZINE, JASON ROOP, MELISSA SCOTT SINCLAIR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2018cv01102
Plaintiff:
GARY LEE SMITH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, MARK S. INCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEAVER v. RUSSELL et al
as 1:2018cv00961
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN D. WEAVER
Defendant:
MICHAEL D. RUSSELL, RANDOLPH W. SAWYER, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. KAINE et al
as 1:2018cv00612
Plaintiff:
MACEO JONES
Defendant:
THOMAS KAINE, ANGELA DUNBAR, LE MASTERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ISAAC v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2018cv00173
Plaintiff:
WENDELL D. ISAAC
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, J. DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARROLL v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2018cv00106
Plaintiff:
WESLEY CARROLL
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS, DOROTHY A. LEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIERCE v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2017cv02296
Petitioner:
SEAVON PIERCE
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, KAMALA D. HARRIS, VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GEORGE v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2017cv02128
Plaintiff:
MARK D. GEORGE
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, RODGERS and PETER NEWSHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AGUIAR v. STANCIL et al
as 1:2017cv02050
Plaintiff:
ANDRES AGUIAR
Defendant:
M. A. STANCIL, JACKSON, P. SCARBER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
