Cases 81 - 90 of 382
LAMBROS v. FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL et al
as 1:2019cv01929
Defendant:
FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL and State of Rio de Janeiro of the Federative Republic of Brazil
Plaintiff:
JOHN GREGORY LAMBROS
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
LAVICTOR v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2019cv01900
Defendant:
WILLIAM E. BORDLEY, SUSAN B. GERSON, DONALD TRUMP and others
Plaintiff:
LYNN MICHAEL LAVICTOR
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
NAHOLI v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2019cv02012
Plaintiff:
KEVIN NAHOLI
Defendant:
WILLIAM E. BORDLEY, SUSAN B. GERSON, DONALD TRUMP and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
BARNES v. NEWSHAM et al
as 1:2019cv02190
Defendant:
JANE DOE, JOHN DOE and PETER NEWSHAM
Plaintiff:
JUAN SYLVESTER BARNES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CERRUTI v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2019cv02107
Defendant:
WILLIAM E. BORDLEY, SUSAN B. GERSON, DONALD TRUMP and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CERRUTI
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
DEMOS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv02391
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND, U.S. TREASURY SECRETARY, WORLD BANK and others
Plaintiff:
SOCIETY OF T.R.U.T.H. and JOHN R. DEMOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DEMOS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv02385
Defendant:
U.S. MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX, U.S. SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, NATIONAL SECURITY DIRECTOR and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN R. DEMOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AMIN v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2019cv01572
Defendant:
WILLIAM E. BORDLEY, SUSAN B. GERSON, DONALD TRUMP and others
Plaintiff:
ALI SHUKRI AMIN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
COLEMAN v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2019cv02187
Defendant:
WILLIAM E. BORDLEY, SUSAN B. GERSON, DONALD TRUMP and others
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
HARVEY v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2019cv02196
Defendant:
WILLIAM E. BORDLEY, SUSAN B. GERSON, DONALD TRUMP and others
Plaintiff:
ADRION HARVEY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
