Cases 1 - 10 of 10
HINTON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2021cv01295
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Plaintiff:
SUNDAY HINTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HINTON v. POPPIN
as 1:2020cv01178
Plaintiff:
KENNETH HINTON
Defendant:
DARREN POPPIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HINTON v. SHEFFERMAN
as 1:2020cv00684
Plaintiff:
KENNETH HINTON
Defendant:
BRIAN DAVID SHEFFERMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James Johnson v. Adrian Fenty, et al
as 10-5105
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James F. Johnson
Defendant - Appellee:
Anthony A. Williams, Mayor, Adrian Fenty, Mayor, Paul Alonzo Quander, Jr., Director, Court Services Supervision Agency and others
Kenneth Hinton v. James Rudasill
as 09-7071
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kenneth Adolphus Hinton
Defendant - Appellee:
James W. Rudasill, Jr.
James Johnson v. Adrian Fenty, et al
as 09-5237
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James F. Johnson
Defendant - Appellee:
Adrian Fenty, Mayor, Paul Alonzo Quander, Jr., Director, Court Services Supervision Agency, Paul Brennan, Supervisor, Court Services Supervision Agency and others
HINTON v. RUDASILL
as 1:2008cv01073
Plaintiff:
KENNETH A. HINTON
Defendant:
JAMES W. RUDASILL, JR.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HINTON v. CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
as 1:2008cv00778
Plaintiff:
KENNETH A. HINTON
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HINTON v. CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA CORRECTIONAL TREATMENT FACILITY et al
as 1:2008cv00667
Plaintiff:
KENNETH A. HINTON
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA CORRECTIONAL TREATMENT FACILITY, CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA CORRECTIONAL TREATMENT FACILITY, CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA CORRECTIONAL TREATMENT FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HINTON v. CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
as 1:2008cv00312
Plaintiff:
KENNETH A. HINTON
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
