Cases 1 - 10 of 12
MARTIN v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2022cv01594
Plaintiff:
DONALD LYNN MARTIN
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
LAVICTOR v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2019cv01900
Defendant:
WILLIAM E. BORDLEY, SUSAN B. GERSON, DONALD TRUMP and others
Plaintiff:
LYNN MICHAEL LAVICTOR
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Darnell Stanley v. Isaac Fulwood, Jr., et al
as 13-5326
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Darnell Stanley
Defendant - Appellee:
Isaac Fulwood, Jr., Chairman, United States Parole Commission, Lynne Jenkins, Hearing Examiner and others
STANLEY v. FULWOOD et al
as 1:2013cv00430
Plaintiff:
DARNELL STANLEY
Defendant:
ISAAC FULWOOD, JR., UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, LYNNE E. JENKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BAGBY v. CHU et al
as 1:2013cv00099
Plaintiff:
CEDRIC WAYNE BAGBY
Defendant:
SHARON Y. CHU, VANESSA D. GILMORE, ANDREW J. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REVELS v. GAZEK
as 1:2012cv01027
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LYNN REVELS
Defendant:
NATANIA GAZEK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOODSON v. HOLDER
as 1:2012cv00675
Plaintiff:
ALBERT LYNN WOODSON
Defendant:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. LEIBOVITZ et al
as 1:2012cv00571
Plaintiff:
DERRON SMITH
Defendant:
LYNN LEIBOVITZ, RUSSELL F. CANAN, GLENN KIRSHNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leander Davis v. William Suter, et al
as 10-5008
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Leander G. Davis
Defendant - Appellee:
William K. Suter, Clerk of the US Supreme Court, Laura E. Kerns, Esquire, District Attorney for Philadelphia County and Lynne M. Abraham, Esquire, District Attorney for Philadelphia County
DAVIS v. SUTER et al
as 1:2009cv01989
Plaintiff:
LEANDER G. DAVIS
Defendant:
WILLIAM K. SUTER, LAURA E. KERNS and LYNNE M. ABRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
