Other Statutory Actions Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
TEGNA INC. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023mc00087
In Re: TEGNA INC. doing business as WUSA9
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LAUREN HANDY, JOHN HINSHAW and others
In re: U.S. Office of Personnel Management Data Security
as 23-5021
In Re: In re: U.S. Office of Personnel Management Data Security Breach Litigation
Plaintiff / Appellee: American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, Robert Crawford, Adam Dale and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Carmela Romerio
Defendant / Appellee: Office of Personnel Management, Guy Cavallo, Chief Information Officer of U.S. Office of Personnel Management, in his official capacity, Kiran Ahuja, Director of United States Office of Personnel Management, in her Official Capacity and others
IN RE: U.S. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015mc01394
Defendant: PERATON RISK DECISION INC, UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, DONNA SEYMOUR and others
In Re: IN RE: U.S. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION
Plaintiff: AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, ROBERT CRAWFORD, ADAM DALE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
REED v. LIPNIC et al
as 1:2019cv01380
Plaintiff: Renee Reed
Defendant: VICTORIA A. LIPNIC, HEATHER A. WILSON, JOSEPH L. LENGYEL and others
Not Yet Classified: Paul Rodgers, PATRICK M. SHANAHAN and JOSEPH LENGYEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
ARNESS v. MATTIS et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv01796
Plaintiff: Mark K. Arness
Undetermined: SECAF SECRETARY OF DEPARTMENT OF AIR FORCE and SECDOD SECRETARY OF DEFENSE
Defendant: HEATHER WILSON and JAMES MATTIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
YUKON-KUSKOKWIM HEALTH CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv02474
Plaintiff: YUKON-KUSKOKWIM HEALTH CORPORATION
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RYAN ZINKE and HEATHER WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
In re: U.S. Office of Personnel Mgmt.
as 17-5232
In Re: In re: U.S. Office of Personnel Management Data Security Breach Litigation
Plaintiff - Appellant: American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, Travis Arnold, Tony Bachtell and others
Plaintiff - Appellee: Adam Dale, Mary C. Woo, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Victor W. Hobbs, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee: Office of Personnel Management, Kathleen McGettigan, Acting Director of United States Office of Personnel Management, in her Official Capacity, Keypoint Government Solutions, a Delaware corporation and others
CANALES v. WALZEL et al
as 1:2017mc02493
Plaintiff: ANA CANALES
Defendant: HEATHER ANN WALZEL and ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Motion to Enforce Subpoena
In re: U.S. Office of Personnel Mgmt.
as 17-5217
In Re: In re: U.S. Office of Personnel Management Data Security Breach Litigation
Plaintiff - Appellee: American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, Robert Crawford, Adam Dale and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: National Treasury Employees Union, Stephen Howell, John Ortino and others
Defendant - Appellee: Office of Personnel Management, Beth F. Cobert, Acting Director of United States Office of Personnel Management, in her Official Capacity, Kathleen McGettigan, Acting Director of United States Office of Personnel Management, in her Official Capacity and others
BOLD ALLIANCE et al v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv01822
Plaintiff: BOLD ALLIANCE , BOLD EDUCATION FUND , FRIENDS OF NELSON COUNTY and others
Defendant: FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, NEIL CHATTERJEE, CHERYL A. LAFLEUR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?