Cases 1 - 9 of 9
ARKANSAS HEART HOSPITAL, LLC v. WALSH et al
as 1:2023cv00703
Plaintiff:
ARKANSAS HEART HOSPITAL, LLC
Defendant:
MARTIN J. WALSH, BRIAN PASTERNAK and LINDSEY BALDWIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
WILLIAMSON v. LINDSEY et al
as 1:2022mc00127
Petitioner:
ANTONIO-DIONTE WILLIAMSON
Respondent:
COLIN LINDSEY, REBECCA GRADY JENNINGS, REGINA EDWARDS and others
GRAHAM v. WILLIS et al
as 1:2022mc00068
In Re:
Honorable FANI T. WILLIS and CERTIFICATE OF MATERIAL WITNESS
Not Classified By Court:
LINDSEY GRAHAM and ANITA JOSEY-HERRING
Petitioner:
LINDSEY O. GRAHAM
Respondent:
FANI T. WILLIS
BIRON v. GEORGE et al
as 1:2021cv03307
Plaintiff:
LISA A. BIRON
Defendant:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL and LINDSEY GEORGE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
MCMAHON v. CRUZ et al
as 1:2019cv03774
Defendant:
Sen TED CRUZ, SEN RAND PAUL, SEN MITCH MCCONNELL and others
Plaintiff:
MARTIN MCMAHON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JOLLY v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2019cv00272
Defendant:
EMBASSY OF THE UNITED STATES, ISLAMABAD, PAKISTAN, U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
Plaintiff:
LINDSEY N. JOLLY
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
SPENCER v. WILLIAMS
as 1:2010cv00993
Plaintiff:
SONJA SPENCER
Defendant:
LINDSEY T. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
In Re SUBPOENA TO FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2008mc00749
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES
Respondent:
ZACK PRESTON LINDSEY, JR. and CHIMES INTERNATIONAL, LIMITED
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ctr Law Educ, et al v. EDUC
as 02-5227
Plaintiff - Appellant:
The Center for Law and Education, Designs for Change and Rachelle Lindsey
Plaintiff - Terminated Party:
National Coalition for the Homeless and National Law Center On Homelessness and Poverty
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Education
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
