Cases 1 - 10 of 3,260
PRESCOTT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv01886
Plaintiff:
DERIC W PRESCOTT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR ORDER FOR COMMISSIONERS APPOINTMENT FOR FRAUD INVESTIGATION
as 1:2024ml01350
Not Yet Classified:
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR ORDER FOR COMMISSIONERS APPOINTMENT FOR FRAUD INVESTIGATION
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
MARK MEADOWS v. COLLEEN SHOGAN
as 1:2024cv01856
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR ORDER FOR COMMISSIONERS APPOINTMENT FOR FRAUD INVESTIGATION
as 1:2024ml01328
Not Yet Classified:
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR ORDER FOR COMMISSIONERS APPOINTMENT FOR FRAUD INVESTIGATION
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
YI v. JADDOU et al
as 1:2024cv01694
Plaintiff:
BING YI
Defendant:
UR MENDOZA JADDOU and UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
MILLS et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024mc00072
Petitioner:
BRENDA MILLS and FRISELLA BROWN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
INDIANA, STATE OF et al v. HAALAND, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR et al
as 1:2024cv01665
Petitioner:
INDIANA, STATE OF, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA and others
Respondent:
DEB HAALAND, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, SHARON BUCCINO and others
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 1276 Interior: Review of Agency Action
CELEY v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
as 1:2024cv01602
Plaintiff:
TYRONE CELEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
