Cases 1 - 10 of 401
FARMER et al v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY et al
as 1:2024cv01654
Plaintiff:
JAMES FARMER, ROBIN ALESSI, PATSY SCHULTZ and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and MICHAEL S. REGAN
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Committee for Constructive Tomorrow, et al v. Department of Interior, et al
as 24-5151
Plaintiff:
Committee for Constructive Tomorrow, Heartland Institute, a non-profit corporation, Craig Rucker, an individual and others
Defendant:
Department of Interior, Debra A. Haaland, Secretary of the Interior, acting in her official capacity, United States Bureau of Ocean Management and others
National Parks Conservation Association v. DOI, et al
as 24-5147
Plaintiff:
National Parks Conservation Association
Defendant:
United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Charles F. Sams, III, in his Official Capacity as Director of the National Park Service and others
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. Michael Regan, et al
as 24-5101
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity, Defenders of Wildlife, Sierra Club and others
Defendant:
Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as Administrator for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Protection Agency, Radhika Fox, in her official capacity as Assistant Administrator for the Office of Water of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and others
Intervenor:
Tarpon Blue Silver King I, LLC, doing business as Collier Enterprises, Ltd., State of Florida and Florida Department of Environmental Protection
New Mexico Cattle Growers' Association v. FWS, et al
as 24-5075
Plaintiff:
New Mexico Cattle Growers' Association
Defendant:
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, United States Department of the Interior, Debra A. Haaland, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior and others
Not Yet Classified:
Center for Biological Diversity
Intervenor:
Maricopa Audubon Society
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. Gina Raimondo, et al
as 24-5071
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity, Defenders of Wildlife and Conservation Law Foundation, 18-cv-00283-JEB
Defendant:
Gina M. Raimondo, Secretary of the Department of Commerce and Janet Coit, in her official capacity as Assistant Administrator of NOAA Fisheries
Intervenor:
Maine Lobstermen's Association, Massachusetts Lobstermen's Association, State of Maine and others
ALLEY CAT ALLIES INCORPORATED v. UNITED STATES NATIONAL PARK SERVICE et al
as 1:2024cv00876
Plaintiff:
ALLEY CAT ALLIES INCORPORATED
Defendant:
UNITED STATES NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, CHARLES F. SAMS, III, MARK FOUST and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
COMMITTEE FOR CONSTRUCTIVE TOMORROW et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR et al
as 1:2024cv00774
Plaintiff:
COMMITTEE FOR CONSTRUCTIVE TOMORRO, THE HEARTLAND INSTITUTE, CRAIG RUCKER and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, DEB HAALAND, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF OCEAN MANAGEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
GREEN OCEANS et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR et al
as 1:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
GREEN OCEANS, RESPONSIBLE OFFSHORE DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE, SAVE RIGHT WHALES COALITION and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DEB HAALAND, BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT and others
Petitioner:
SOUTH FORK WIND, LLC and REVOLUTION WIND, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY et al v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE et al
as 1:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, GREENBRIER RIVER WATERSHED ASSOCIATION, APPALACHIAN VOICES and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, RANDY MOORE and JASON HATTERSLEY
Intervenor:
SOUTH FORK COAL COMPANY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
