Cases 1 - 5 of 5
El Puente, et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 23-5189
Plaintiff / Appellant:
El Puente, CORALations and Center for Biological Diversity
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Scott A. Spellmon, Lieutenant, Chief of Engineers and Commanding General, Army Corps of Engineers, Gina M. Raimondo, Secretary of Commerce and others
Amicus Curiae:
Toabajenos en Defensa del Ambiente, Amigx del M.A.R., Rachel Silverstein, Ph.D. and others
NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE ASSOCIATION et al v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS et al
as 1:2022cv03498
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE ASSOCIATION, NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and MICHAEL CONNOR
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
MANZANITA BAND OF THE KUMEYAAY NATION et al v. WOLF et al
as 1:2020cv02712
Plaintiff:
MANZANITA BAND OF THE KUMEYAAY NATION, EWIIAAPAAYP BAND OF KUMEYAAY INDIANS, KUMEYAAY HERITAGE PRESERVATION COUNCIL and others
Defendant:
TODD SEMONITE, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, CHAD WOLF and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITY PROJECT et al v. WHEELER et al
as 1:2020cv01734
Plaintiff:
ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITY PROJECT, PATUXENT RIVERKEEPER, LOWER SUSQUEHANNA RIVERKEEPER and others
Defendant:
RICKEY DALE "R.D. JAMES, ANDREW WHEELER, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and others
Petitioner:
NATIONAL CATTLEMEN'S BEEF ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN ROAD AND TRANSPORTATION BUILDERS ASSOCIATION, EDISON ELECTRIC INSTITUTE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
ALABAMA POWER COMPANY v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS et al
as 1:2015cv00699
Plaintiff:
ALABAMA POWER COMPANY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, JOHN M. MCHUGH, JO-ELLEN DARCY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
