Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01593
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Adirondack Medical Center, et al v. Kathleen Sebeliu
as 12-5366
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Adirondack Medical Center, Alice Hyde Medical Center, Ashtabula County Medical Center and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Corning Hospital, Sid Peterson Memorial Hospital, doing business as Peterson Regional Medical Center and Via Christi Hospital Pittsburg, Inc., doing business as Mt. Carmel Regional Medical Center, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Kathleen Sebelius, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00811
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
LEWIS-BURKE ASSOCIATES LLC v. WIDDER
as 1:2009cv00302
Plaintiff:
LEWIS-BURKE ASSOCIATES LLC and LEWIS-BURKE ASSOCIATES LLC
Defendant:
JOEL WIDDER
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HALL et al v. LEAVITT et al
as 1:2008cv01715
Plaintiff:
BRIAN HALL, LEWIS RANDALL and NORMAN ROGERS
Defendant:
MICHAEL LEAVITT and MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
City of Harper Woods Employees v. Richard (Dick) Olver, et al
as 08-7101
Plaintiff - Appellant:
City of Harper Woods Employees' Retirement System, Derivatively on Behalf of BAE Systems, PLC.
Defendant - Appellee:
Richard (Dick) L. Olver, Michael J. Turner, Walter P. Havenstein and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01451
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
CITY OF HARPER WOODS EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. OLVER et al
as 1:2007cv01646
Plaintiff:
CITY OF HARPER WOODS EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Defendant:
RICHARD (DICK) L. OLVER, MICHAEL J. TURNER, WALTER P. HAVENSTEIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
