Cases 11 - 20 of 112
ALCOA CORPORATION et al v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 1:2020cv00375
Defendant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
INTALCO ALUMINUM, LLC, NORTHWEST ALLOYS, INC., ALUMAX MILL PRODUCTS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION (NO. II)- MDL NO. 2925
as 1:2020mc00008
Plaintiff:
WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, NORTHERN INDIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY LLC, AK STEEL CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and others
In Re:
RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION (NO. II)- MDL NO. 2925
Interested Party:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION, UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION, CVR ENERGY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Select Specialty Hospital - D, et al v. Alex Azar, II
as 20-5004
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Select Specialty Hospital - Tallahassee, Inc., doing business as Select Specialty Hospital - Tallahassee, Select Specialty Hospital - Jackson, Inc., doing business as Select Specialty Hospital - Jackson, Select Specialty Hospital - Quad Cities, Inc., doing business as Select Specialty Hospital - Quad Cities and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Alex M. Azar, II, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
University of Kansas Hospital, et al v. Alex Azar, II
as 19-5353
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Vanderbilt University Medical Center, OSF Healthcare System, d/b/a Saint Anthony's Health Center, Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority, d/b/a Atrium Health Pineville and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Alex M. Azar, II, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health & Human Services
Amicus Curiae:
The OrthoForum, Large Urology Group Practice Association and Digestive Health Physicians Association
Derrick Tartt v. USA, et al
as 19-5308
Defendant / Appellee:
Ann Claire Williams, Justice (retired), Donald Pochyly, A. Lauer, Judge and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Derrick B. Tartt
NORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
as 1:2019cv03283
Plaintiff:
NORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Anne Arundel County, Maryland, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-1225
Petitioner:
Wilmington, Delaware, Chevy Chase Village, Maryland, Minneapolis, MN and others
Respondent:
United States of America and Federal Communications Commission
State of New York, et al v. DOL, et al
as 19-5125
Plaintiff / Appellee:
District of Columbia, State of Maryland, State of Washington and others
Defendant / Appellant:
United States of America, United States Department of Labor and R. Alexander Acosta, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Labor
Amicus Curiae:
Lake Cities Chamber of Commerce, (Texas), State of Kentucky, by and through Governor Matt Bevin, Las Vegas Latin Chamber of Commerce, (Nevada) and others
BHC Northwest Psychiatric Hosp v. Secretary of Labor
as 19-1089
Petitioner:
BHC Northwest Psychiatric Hospital, LLC, d/b/a Brooke Glen Behavioral Hospital
Respondent:
Secretary of Labor
Shands Jacksonville Medical, et al v. Alex Azar, II
as 19-5086
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Shands Teaching Hospital and Clinics, Inc., doing business as UFHealth Shands Hospital, Palmerton Hospital-Carbon, 16-cv-01543, San Joaquin Community Hospital, 14cv1477, doing business as Adventist Health/San Joaquin Community Hospital and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Southlake Specialty Hospital, LLC, 15-cv-01793, doing business as Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Southlake, Rockwall Regional Center, LLC, 15-cv-01793, doing business as Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Rockwall, Flower Mound Hospital Partners, LLC, 15-cv-01793, doing business as Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Flower Mound and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Alex Michael Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
