Cases 21 - 30 of 52
Shands Jacksonville Medical, et al v. Alex Azar, II
as 19-5087
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Shands Teaching Hospital and Clinics, Inc., doing business as UFHealth Shands Hospital, San Joaquin Community Hospital, 14cv1477, doing business as Adventist Health/San Joaquin Community Hospital, Memorial Hospital Flagler, Inc., 15cv192 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Fort Payne Hospital Corporation, 14cv1477, doing business as Dekalb Regional Medical Center, Longmont United Hospital, 15-cv-01800, Willis-Knighton Medical Center, 15-cv-01800 and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Alex Michael Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services
Shands Jacksonville Medical, et al v. Alex Azar, II
as 19-5085
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Shands Teaching Hospital and Clinics, Inc., doing business as UFHealth Shands Hospital, Palmerton Hospital-Carbon, 16-cv-01543, San Joaquin Community Hospital, 14cv1477, doing business as Adventist Health/San Joaquin Community Hospital and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Carilion Medical Center, 15cv192, Tarpon Springs Hospital Foundation, Inc., 15cv192, Southwest Volusia Healthcare Corporation, 15cv192 and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Alex Michael Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services
Shands Jacksonville Medical, et al v. Alex Azar, II
as 19-5086
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Shands Teaching Hospital and Clinics, Inc., doing business as UFHealth Shands Hospital, Palmerton Hospital-Carbon, 16-cv-01543, San Joaquin Community Hospital, 14cv1477, doing business as Adventist Health/San Joaquin Community Hospital and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Southlake Specialty Hospital, LLC, 15-cv-01793, doing business as Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Southlake, Rockwall Regional Center, LLC, 15-cv-01793, doing business as Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Rockwall, Flower Mound Hospital Partners, LLC, 15-cv-01793, doing business as Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Flower Mound and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Alex Michael Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services
KENTUCKY HOSPITAL, LLC et al v. PRICE et al
as 1:2017cv01201
Plaintiff:
KENTUCKY HOSPITAL, LLC , PINELAKE REGIONAL HOSPITAL, LLC , SPRING VIEW HOSPITAL, LLC and others
Defendant:
THOMAS E. PRICE, SEEMA VERMA and CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
FORT MCDERMITT PAIUTE AND SHOSHONE TRIBE v. PRICE et al
as 1:2017cv00837
Plaintiff:
FORT MCDERMITT PAIUTE AND SHOSHONE TRIBE
Defendant:
THOMAS E. PRICE, CHRISTOPHER BUCHANAN and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PAYNE v. PROUD MARY'S OWNERS et al
as 1:2017mc00958
Plaintiff:
ERIC PAYNE
Defendant:
PROUD MARY'S OWNERS, KASS, MITEK & KASS, PLLC, HOWARD PAYNE, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
John Cheeks, et al v. Fort Myer Construction Corpor, et al
as 17-7016
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John C. Cheeks, Cheeks of North America, Inc. and Juanita Q. Gallardo
Defendant - Appellee:
Fort Myer Construction Corporation, Francisco Rodrigues Neto, Jose Rodrigues and others
Global TelLink v. FCC, et al
as 15-1461
Petitioner:
Global Tel*Link
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
Ulandis Forte, Ethel Peoples, Laurie Lamancusa and others
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-1363
Petitioner:
State of West Virginia, State of Texas, State of Alabama and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency, Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, E. Scott Pruitt, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and others
Intervenor:
American Wind Energy Association, Advanced Energy Economy, American Lung Association and others
Amicus Curiae:
William D. Ruckelshaus, William K. Reilly, Philip Zoebisch and others
NLRB v. Fort Dearborn Company
as 15-1007
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
Fort Dearborn Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
