Cases 21 - 30 of 150
Howard Tyson, Sr. v. Louis DeJoy
as 21-5279
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Howard T. Tyson, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General
Terrance Williams, Sr. v. Turner Security, Inc.
as 21-7119
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Terrance Williams, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Turner Security, Inc.
Howard Tyson, Sr. v. Louis DeJoy
as 21-5191
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Howard T. Tyson, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General
Timothy Hankins, Sr. v. State of North Carolina, et al
as 21-5156
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Timothy Omar Hankins, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
State of North Carolina, NC Administrative Officers of the Courts, North Carolina Court of Appeals and others
ENGLANDER v. BLUNT
as 1:2021mc00111
Plaintiff:
BRADFORD F. ENGLANDER
Defendant:
ROGER R. BLUNT, SR.
Debtor:
ESSEX CONSTRUCTION, LLC
ENGLANDER v. BLUNT et al
as 1:2021mc00112
Plaintiff:
BRADFORD F. ENGLANDER
Defendant:
ROGER R. BLUNT, SR., VIVIAN W. BOWERS, VERTICAL PLACEMENT SOLUTIONS, LLC and others
Debtor:
ESSEX CONSTRUCTION, LLC
LEE et al v. IRAN
as 1:2019cv00830
Plaintiff:
BILLY DOAL WELLS, D.J.H., LOLA JEAN MODJESKA and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
O'NEILL et al v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2021cv01288
Plaintiff:
SHARON PREMOLI, ESTATE OF CHRISTOPHER W. WODENSHEK, CHRISTINE I. O'NEILL and others
Defendant:
JANET L. YELLEN, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
HANKINS v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2021cv01066
Defendant:
WAKE COUNTY CHILD PROTECTION SERVICE, NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS, WEST COUNTY DISTRICT COURT and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY OMAR HANKINS, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Albert Jones, Sr. v. DOJ
as 21-5087
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Justice
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Albert T. Jones, Sr.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
