Cases 31 - 40 of 11,755
Friends of Animals v. United States Bureau of Land Management, et al
as 24-5149
Plaintiff:
Friends of Animals
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Land Management, an agency of the United States
Intervenor:
State of Utah
USA v. Carlton Joyner
as 24-3073
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Carlton Joyner, also known as Carlton Everette Joyner
Wireless Internet Service Providers Association v. FCC, et al
as 24-1168
Petitioner:
Wireless Internet Service Providers Association
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
National Parks Conservation Association v. DOI, et al
as 24-5147
Plaintiff:
National Parks Conservation Association
Defendant:
United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Charles F. Sams, III, in his Official Capacity as Director of the National Park Service and others
HERITAGE FOUNDATION et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
as 1:2024cv01589
Plaintiff:
HERITAGE FOUNDATION and MIKE HOWELL
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
ALKOUDMANI et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2024cv01588
Plaintiff:
RASHA ALKOUDMANI and NASSER SELO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
USA v. Robert Miller
as 24-3071
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Robert Frank Miller, also known as Robert Franklin Miller
CTIA - The Wireless Association v. FCC, et al
as 24-1166
Petitioner:
CTIA - The Wireless Association
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
RIOJAS v. UNITED STATES
as 1:2024cv01577
Plaintiff:
PAUL ANTHONY RIOJAS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
