Other Statutes Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 420
DEAN v. UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE et al
as 1:2023cv02518
Petitioner: HESHAM DEAN
Respondent: UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
OSMAN v. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL POLICE ORGANIZATION et al
as 1:2023cv02108
Plaintiff: SHERIF OSMAN
Defendant: INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL POLICE ORGANIZATION, THE ARAB INTERIOR MINISTERS COUNCIL, EGYPT and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2331 Anti-terrorism Act
DAUD et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2023cv01959
Plaintiff: SUMMIYA DAUD and MUHAMMAD ZAKARIA KHAN
Defendant: ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, DONALD BLOME and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
John Doe v. SEC
as 23-1161
Petitioner: John Doe
Respondent: Securities and Exchange Commission
AGWU v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2023cv01760
Plaintiff: IFEANYI AGWU
Defendant: ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, DAVID GREENE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Marne Mitskog v. DOJ, et al
as 23-5121
Plaintiff / Appellant: Marne K. Mitskog
Defendant / Appellee: United States Department of Justice, Jennie L. Kneedler, Stephen J. Buckingham and others
John Doe v. SEC
as 23-1124
Petitioner: John Doe, (Claimant #1)
Respondent: Securities and Exchange Commission
John Doe v. SEC
as 23-1121
Petitioner: John Doe, (Claimant #1)
Respondent: Securities and Exchange Commission
SHARMIN v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2023cv01015
Plaintiff: SAJIA SHARMIN
Defendant: ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, HELEN LAFAVE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
MASHHOUR et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2023cv00877
Plaintiff: ABDUL KHALEK MASHHOUR and NELLY NAHHAS
Defendant: ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, HENRY T. WOOSTER and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?