Other Statutes Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 51 - 60 of 677
DAKOTA RESOURCE COUNCIL et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01853
Plaintiff: DAKOTA RESOURCE COUNCIL, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, LIVING RIVERS and others
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DEBRA HAALAND, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and others
Not Classified By Court: STATE OF UTAH, STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA and others
Intervenor Defendant: STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Concerned Household Electricity Consumer's Council, et al v. EPA
as 22-1139
Petitioner: Concerned Household Electricity Consumer's Council, Joseph S. D'Aleo, Clement Dwyer, Jr. and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor: American Lung Association, American Public Health Association, Appalachian Mountain Club and others
Amicus Curiae: William Happer, Christopher Field, Richard S. Lindzen and others
California Department of Water Resources State, et al v. FERC
as 22-1113
Petitioner: California Department of Water Resources State Water Project, California Public Utilities Commission, Cities of Anaheim, Azusa, Banning, Colton, Pasadena, and Riverside, California and others
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01716
Plaintiff: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and WILDEARTH GUARDIANS
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DEBRA HAALAND, U.S. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and others
Intervenor Defendant: CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.
Petitioner: OXY USA INC., OXY USA WTP LP, ANADARKO E&P ONSHORE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Southeast Austin Neighbors and Residents Organized, et al v. FAA, et al
as 22-1093
Petitioner: Southeast Austin Neighbors and Residents Organized for Environmental Justice and People Organized in Defense of the Earth and Her Resources
Respondent: Federal Aviation Administration and Billy Nolen, in his official capacity as the Acting Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration
CALIFORNIA COMMUNITIES AGAINST TOXICS et al v. REGAN
as 1:2022cv01457
Plaintiff: CALIFORNIA COMMUNITIES AGAINST TOXICS, CLEAN AIR COUNCIL, CLEAN POWER LAKE COUNTY and others
Defendant: MICHAEL S. REGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604 Clear Air Act (Emission Standards)
Clean Fuels Development Coalition, et al v. EPA
as 22-1085
Petitioner: Clean Fuels Development Coalition, ICM, Inc., Illinois Corn Growers Association and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor: State of California, State of Colorado, State of Connecticut and others
State of Ohio, et al v. EPA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-1081
Petitioner: State of Ohio, State of Alabama, State of Arkansas and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor: State of California, State of Colorado, State of Connecticut and others
Amicus Curiae: The Two Hundred for Housing Equity, Americans for Tax Reform, American Commitment and others
Not Yet Classified: ConservAmerica
Natural Resources Defense Council v. NHTSA, et al
as 22-1080
Petitioner: Natural Resources Defense Council
Respondent: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Steven Cliff, in his official capacity as Deputy Administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and Pete Buttigieg, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Transportation
Electric Energy, Inc., et al v. EPA, et al
as 22-1056
Petitioner: Electric Energy, Inc., Luminant Generation Company LLC, Coleto Creek Power, LLC and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?