Cases 1 - 10 of 397
Stacia Hall, et al v. District of Columbia Board of Elections
as 24-7050
Plaintiff:
Stacia Hall, Ralph Chittams, Suzzanne Keller and others
Defendant:
District of Columbia Board of Elections
DANTZLER v. JORDEN et al
as 1:2024cv00986
Plaintiff:
OSCAR DANTZLER and OSCAR C. DANTZLER
Defendant:
WILLIAM WILL JORDEN, DOUGLAS WELBORN, ALVIN JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
RIOJAS v. UNITED STATES
as 1:2024cv01577
Plaintiff:
PAUL ANTHONY RIOJAS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
HASHEMPOUR ROODSARI v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al
as 1:2024cv01094
Plaintiff:
MAHJABIN HASHEMPOUR ROODSARI
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE and ANTHONY J. BLINKEN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
WILGUS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al
as 1:2024cv01384
Plaintiff:
JAMES VINCENT WILGUS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, ANTHONY J. BLINKEN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
ZARGARAN et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv00904
Plaintiff:
SIMIN ZARGARAN
Not Yet Classified:
ANTHONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, JULIE M. STUFFT and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Stacia Hall, et al v. District of Columbia Board of Elections
as 24-7065
Plaintiff:
Stacia Hall, Ralph Chittams, Suzzanne Keller and others
Defendant:
District of Columbia Board of Elections
CHAUDHARI et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv00789
Plaintiff:
NARAYANBHAI CHAUDHARI and PRIYANK CHAUDHARI
Defendant:
ANTHONY BLINKEN and UR JADDOU
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
DEHGHAN et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv00851
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMAD R. DEHGHAN and PADIDEH DEHGHAN
Defendant:
ANTHONY J. BLINKEN, MORA NAMDAR and SCOTT M. OUDKIRK
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
