Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Dale Adams v. CIA, et al
as 23-5041
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dale B. Adams
Defendant / Appellee:
Central Intelligence Agency, William J. Burns, CIA Director and Allison Fong, CIA FOIA Agent
HAYES v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2022cv01147
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY M. HAYES
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, FBI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ronald Emrit v. CIA
as 21-5180
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant / Appellee:
Central Intelligence Agency, CIA
Brud Rossmann v. Lennert Leader, et al
as 20-5168
Defendant / Appellee:
Lennert Leader, Gina Haspel, Director The U.S Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), Michael G. Harvey, U.S. Magistrate and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Brud Rossmann, Esquire
Alonzo Shephard v. Christopher Wray, et al
as 19-5235
Defendant / Appellee:
Dick Durbin, U.S. Senator & Congress, Sherrod Brown, U.S. Senator & Congress, Merrick B. Garland, U.S. Federal Chief Judge and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alonzo Dean Shephard
GREENE v. CIA et al
as 1:2019cv01963
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA and CIA
Plaintiff:
LAUREN GREENE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ADAMS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ARMY et al
as 1:2019cv02188
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DIRECTOR OF THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, UNITED STATES CIA INFORMATION AND PRIVACY COORDINATOR, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ARMY and others
Plaintiff:
DALE B. ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
PINSON v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2018cv00486
Plaintiff:
JEREMY PINSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and CIA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
WARREN v. CIA et al
as 1:2015cv01473
Plaintiff:
ANDREW WARREN
Defendant:
CIA and LEON PANETTA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
