HAYES v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
| ASHLEY M. HAYES |
| DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, FBI, CIA, US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, FEMA, DEPT. OF HOMELAND SECURITY and DOES 1-100 |
| 1:2022cv01147 |
| April 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER DISMISSING PRO SE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Ordered that the #2 application of the plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis is granted and the #3 motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction is denied. This is a final appealable Order. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 5/17/2022. (ztnr)
|
|
Filing 4
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 5/17/2022. (ztnr)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by ASHLEY M. HAYES. (zmh). Added MOTION for Preliminary Injunction on 5/6/2022 (znmw).
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by ASHLEY M. HAYES. (zmh)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand filed by ASHLEY M. HAYES. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(zmh)
|
|
Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 4/26/2022. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zmh)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
