Other Statutes Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2021cv02786
Plaintiff: DAN ALTSCHULD, MARK S AMATO, Cynthia MATSUMOTO and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
ALTSCHULD et al v. RAIMONDO et al
as 1:2021cv02779
Plaintiff: DAN ET AL ALTSCHULD, DAN ALTSCHULD, MARK S AMATO and others
Not Classified By Court: LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Defendant: Secretary GINA M. RAIMONDO and GINA M. RAIMONDO
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Yvette Beaulieu v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 21-5183
Plaintiff / Appellant: Yvette B. Beaulieu
Defendant / Appellee: Merrick B. Garland, Mark Gross, James R. Clapper, Jr. and others
In re: Darryl Williams
as 19-3021
Undetermined: In re: Darryl D. Williams
In re: Darryl Williams
as 17-3084
In Re - Petitioner: In re: Darryl D. Williams
:
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2015mc00283
Petitioner: AARON D. WILLIAMS
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: Complaint
WILLIAMS v. HEALTH MANAGMENT ASSOCIATES INC. et al
as 1:2014cv00574
Defendant: HEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES INC , JOHN DOE HOSPITALS and MONROE HMA LLC
Plaintiff: RALPH D. WILLIAMS
Intervenor_plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
IN RE: HEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC. QUI TAM LITIGATION (NO. II)
as 1:2014mc00339
Plaintiff: CRAIG S. BRUMMER , THOMAS L. MASON , STEVEN G. FOLSTAD and others
Defendant: HEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC. , MONROE HMA LLC , WINDER HMA LLC and others
Movant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor_plaintiff: USA
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
In re: Darryl William
as 11-3110
In Re - Petitioner: In re: Darryl D. Williams, also known as Black
:
USA v. Darryl William
as 11-3023
Plaintiff - Appellee: United States of America
Defendant - Appellant: Darryl D. Williams, also known as Black

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?