Cases 1 - 10 of 16
John Bradin, et al v. Michael Carvajal, et al
as 21-5027
Respondent / Appellee:
Bureau of Prisons, Southern Center for Human Rights, Michael Carvajal, Director, Bureau of Prisons Central Office and others
Petitioner:
Nicholas Ross, Scott Howie, Gregory Greene and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
John Bradin
Derrick Tartt v. USA, et al
as 19-5308
Defendant / Appellee:
Ann Claire Williams, Justice (retired), Donald Pochyly, A. Lauer, Judge and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Derrick B. Tartt
Shands Jacksonville Medical, et al v. Alex Azar, II
as 19-5227
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Shands Teaching Hospital and Clinics, Inc., doing business as UFHealth Shands Hospital, San Joaquin Community Hospital, 14cv1477, doing business as Adventist Health/San Joaquin Community Hospital, Northeast Georgia Medical Center, 14cv503 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Fort Payne Hospital Corporation, 14cv1477, doing business as Dekalb Regional Medical Center, Siloam Springs Arkansas Hospital Company, Llc, 14cv1477, doing business as Siloam Springs Arkansas Hospital Company, Llc, Lafayette General Medical Center, 15-cv-01800 and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Alex Michael Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services
Joshua Angel v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Co, et al
as 19-7062
Defendant / Appellee:
Jonathan Plutzik, Donald H. Layton, Anthony A. Williams and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joshua J. Angel
Shands Jacksonville Medical, et al v. Alex Azar, II
as 19-5082
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Shands Teaching Hospital and Clinics, Inc., doing business as UFHealth Shands Hospital, Palmerton Hospital-Carbon, 16-cv-01543, San Joaquin Community Hospital, 14cv1477, doing business as Adventist Health/San Joaquin Community Hospital and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lubbock County Hospital District, 14cv503, doing business as University Medical Center, Board Of Trustees of North Kansas City Hospital, 14cv503, doing business as North Kansas City Hospital, Community Hospital of Brazosport, 14cv503, doing business as Brazosport Regional Health System and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Alex Michael Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services
Shands Jacksonville Medical, et al v. Alex Azar, II
as 19-5087
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Shands Teaching Hospital and Clinics, Inc., doing business as UFHealth Shands Hospital, San Joaquin Community Hospital, 14cv1477, doing business as Adventist Health/San Joaquin Community Hospital, Memorial Hospital Flagler, Inc., 15cv192 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Fort Payne Hospital Corporation, 14cv1477, doing business as Dekalb Regional Medical Center, Longmont United Hospital, 15-cv-01800, Willis-Knighton Medical Center, 15-cv-01800 and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Alex Michael Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services
BEYOND NUCLEAR et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, FORRESTAL BUILDING, ROOM GM-174 GROUND FLOOR, SOUTH BUILDING, 1000 INDEPENDENCE AVENUE, S.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20585 et al
as 1:2016cv01641
Plaintiff:
BEYOND NUCLEAR , NUCLEAR INFORMATION AND RESOURCE SERVICE , SAVANNAH RIVER SITE WATCH and others
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, FORRESTAL BUILDING, ROOM GM-174 GROUND FLOOR, SOUTH BUILDING, 1000 INDEPENDENCE AVENUE, S.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20585 , ERNEST MONIZ , MONICA C REGALBUTO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7422
SHUSTER v. GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2011cv01149
Plaintiff:
FORREST W.H. SHUSTER
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and PATRICK SCHAUT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NLRB v. Atrium of Princeton, LLC, et al
as 10-1408
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
Atrium of Princeton, LLC, Pavilions at Forrestal and Princeton Healthcare, LLC, doing business as Pavilions at Forrestal
Atrium of Princeton, LLC v. NLRB
as 10-1352
Petitioner:
Atrium of Princeton, LLC, Pavilions at Forrestal and Princeton Healthcare, LLC, doing business as Pavilions at Forrestal
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
