Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Wireless Internet Service Providers Association v. FCC, et al
as 24-1047
Petitioner:
Wireless Internet Service Providers Association
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
INFORMATION ASSOCIATED WITH FOUR ACCOUNT(S) STORED AT PREMISES CONTROLLED BY THREE PROVIDER(S) PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 2703 FOR INVESTIGATION OF VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. 875(d)
as 1:2024sc00335
Not Yet Classified:
INFORMATION ASSOCIATED WITH FOUR ACCOUNT(S) STORED AT PREMISES CONTROLLED BY THREE PROVIDER(S) PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 2703 FOR INVESTIGATION OF VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. 875(d)
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Westmoreland Mining Holdings L v. EPA, et al
as 19-1176
Petitioner:
Westmoreland Mining Holdings LLC
Respondent:
Andrew Wheeler, Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Protection Agency and Jane Nishida, Acting Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency
Amicus Curiae:
City of Portland, Debra A. Haaland, Michael Oppenheimer and others
Intervenor:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Center for Biological Diversity, City of Boulder and others
American Lung Association, et al v. EPA, et al
as 19-1140
Respondent:
Andrew Wheeler, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency and Jane Nishida, Acting Administrator
Petitioner:
American Lung Association and American Public Health Association
Intervenor:
State of Kansas, Phil Bryant, Governor of the State of Mississippi, State of Texas and others
Amicus Curiae:
City of Portland, Debra A. Haaland, Michael Oppenheimer and others
INFORMATION ASSOCIATED WITH ONE ACCOUNT STORED AT PREMISES CONTROLLED BY ONE PROVIDER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 2703 FOR INVESTIGATION OF VIOLATIONS OF 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(1) & 933
as 1:2023sc01882
In Re:
INFORMATION ASSOCIATED WITH ONE ACCOUNT STORED AT PREMISES CONTROLLED BY ONE PROVIDER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 2703 FOR INVESTIGATION OF VIOLATIONS OF 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(1) & 933
Interested Party:
USA
State of Oklahoma, et al v. EPA
as 15-1364
Not Yet Classified:
Catholic Climate Covenant, ; Catholic Rural Life; Evangelical Environmental Network; National Council of Churches USA; Coalition on the Environment and Jewish Life; Church World Service; Union of Reform Judaism; Women of Reform Judaism; National Bapt, Don J. Easterbrook, Gordon J. Fulks and others
Amicus Curiae:
Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia, Loggers Association of Northern California, Boulder County, CO and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Petitioner:
Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality and State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Mike Hunter
Electric Power Supply Association, et al v. FERC
as 22-1065
Petitioner:
Electric Power Supply Association, PJM Power Providers Group, Calpine Corporation and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Ascension Borgess Hospital, et al v. Xavier Becerra
as 21-5246
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ascension Borgess Hospital, Ascension Sacred Heart Hospital Pensacola, Ascension SE Wisconsin Hospital-St. Joseph Campus and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Rush Copley Memorial Hospital, 20-cv-01957, Rush Oak Park Hospital, Inc., 20-cv-01957 and Rush University Medical Center, 20-cv-01957
Defendant / Appellee:
Xavier Becerra, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
Electric Power Supply Association, et al v. FERC
as 21-1217
Petitioner:
Electric Power Supply Association, PJM Power Providers Group, Calpine Corporation and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
American Hospital Association, et al v. Alex Azar, II
as 20-5193
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Association of American Medical Colleges, National Association of Children's Hospitals, Bothwell Regional Health Center and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Alex M. Azar, II, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services
Amicus Curiae:
The Connecticut Hospital Association, The Texas Hospital Association, The Healthcare Association of Hawaii and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
