Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Consumers' Research, et al v. FCC, et al
as 23-1091
Petitioner:
Consumers' Research, Cause Based Commerce, Inc., Edward J. Blum and others
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
ROSARIO et al v. AUSTIN et al
as 1:2021cv01928
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. ROSARIO, ROBERT J. RADITZ and MARIA L. GARCIA-REYES
Defendant:
LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, CHRISTINE WORMUTH, THOMAS W. HARKER and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
STIRRUP v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE et al
as 1:2021cv01893
Plaintiff:
HEIDI STIRRUP, MARK EDWARD GREEN, JOHN DOE #3 and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, GENERAL LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
WIEST v. ROTH et al
as 1:2021cv01578
Defendant:
TERRY. L. BULLARD, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHRISTOPHER WRAY and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WIEST
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
STEWART v. ROTH et al
as 1:2021cv01387
Plaintiff:
DAVID STEWART
Defendant:
JOHN ROTH and DANIEL HOKANSON
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
LAGRANGE v. DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
as 1:2021cv00946
Plaintiff:
SHAWN M. LAGRANGE
Defendant:
CHANNING D. PHILLIPS, JOHN P. ROTH, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
LOMBRANO v. DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
as 1:2021cv00872
Defendant:
CHANNING D. PHILLIPS, MERRICK GARLAND, JOHN P. ROTH and others
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER L. LOMBRANO
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
SAFE SKIES CLEAN WATER WISCONSIN, INC. v. UNITED STATES AIR FORCE et al
as 1:2021cv00634
Plaintiff:
SAFE SKIES CLEAN WATER WISCONSIN, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN P ROTH, DANIEL R HOKANSON, NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
ROTH et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE
as 1:2020cv03838
Plaintiff:
FRIMET ROTH and ARNOLD ROTH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
