Other Statutes Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
SI v. BED BATH & BEYOND CORPORATION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv02541
Lead Plaintiff: SI PENGCHENG
Defendant: BED BATH & BEYOND, INC., RC VENTURES LLC, RYAN COHEN and others
Plaintiff: PENGCHENG SI
ARAWOLE v. MASTER SECURITY COMPANY, LLC
as 1:2021cv02675
Defendant: MASTER SECURITY, LLC and MASTER SECURITY COMPANY, LLC
Plaintiff: ADABOYE ARAWOLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Citadel Securities LLC v. SEC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1424
Respondent: Securities and Exchange Commission
Petitioner: Citadel Securities LLC
Intervenor: Investors Exchange LLC
Amicus Curiae: Andrew N. Vollmer, Healthy Markets Association, New York Stock Exchange LLC and others
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv01862
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant: J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES LLC, EMC MORTGAGE, LLC, BEAR STEARNS ASSET BACKED SECURITIES I, LLC and others
Interested Party: GLENVIEW MASTER FUND II, LLC, EP STRUCTURED CREDIT STRATEGIES FUND, LTD and CXA-13 CORPORATION
Petitioner: BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
PARKER v. ABELL et al
as 1:2012mc00010
Plaintiff: CHARLES PARKER
Defendant: VINCENT L. ABELL and COLUMBIA SECURITY LLC
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Lawrence Livermore Ntnl Secur v. NLRB
as 11-1301
Petitioner: Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC
Respondent: National Labor Relations Board
In re: Any & All Funds & Assets, In B, et al v. Opportunity Fund
as 09-5190
In Re: In re: Any & All Funds & Assets, In Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. Acct # 8870792 In Name Of Tiger Eye Investments Ltd. and Any & All Funds & Assets In Any And All Accounts Held At Ubs Ag & Ubs Securities Llc, Stamford, Ct By Or Containing Any Interest Held By Or Controlled By Daniel Valente Dantas And/or Veronica Valente
Respondent - Appellee: Opportunity Fund
Intervenor - Appellee: Tiger Eye Investments, Ltd. and Opportunity Unique Fund
Interested Party - Appellant: United States of America
In re: Any & All Funds & Assets, In B, et al v. Opportunity Fund
as 09-5164
In Re: In re: Any & All Funds & Assets, In Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. Acct # 8870792 In Name Of Tiger Eye Investments Ltd. and Any & All Funds & Assets In Any And All Accounts Held At Ubs Ag & Ubs Securities Llc, Stamford, Ct By Or Containing Any Interest Held By Or Controlled By Daniel Valente Dantas And/or Veronica Valente
Respondent - Appellee: Opportunity Fund
Intervenor - Appellee: Tiger Eye Investments, Ltd.
Interested Party - Appellant: United States of America
In re: Any and all funds, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-5065
In Re: In re: Any and all funds or other assets, in Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. Account #8870792 in the name of Tiger Eye Investments Ltd., Any and all funds or other assets, in any and all Accounts held at UBS AG and UBS Securities LLC, Stamford, CT, by or containing any interest held by or controlled by Daniel Valente Dantas and/or Veronica Valente Dantas, Opportunity Group, Opportunity Fun and Any and all funds or other assets, in the following accounts at Brown Brothers Harriman (Luxembourg) S.C.A.: Account #6459648 in the name of Brown Brothers Harriman (Luxembourg) S.C.A. as Custodian for Opportunity Fund; Account #6459747 in the name of Bro
Petitioner - Appellant: United States of America
Respondent - Appellee: Opportunity Fund
Intervenor - Appellee: Tiger Eye Investments, Ltd.
STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP v. UBS AG et al
as 1:2008mc00116
Petitioner: STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP
Respondent: UBS AG, UBS SECURITIES LLC, BENJAMIN D. LORELLO and others
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash Subpoenas

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?