Other Statutes Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
CHENG et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2023cv02602
Plaintiff: JIAN YI CHENG, XING CHEN, HOURASA SEIRAFITEHRANIAN and others
Defendant: ANTONY BLINKEN, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
APPLICATION OF YI CHEN FOR ACCESS TO THE NAMES OF JURORS EMPANELED IN UNITED STATES V. WANG et al
as 1:2022mc00052
In Re: APPLICATION OF YI CHEN FOR ACCESS TO THE NAMES OF JURORS EMPANELED IN UNITED STATES V. WANG
Petitioner: YI CHEN
Not Classified By Court: UNITED STATES
Yi Tai Shao v. John Roberts, et al
as 21-5210
Plaintiff / Appellant: Yi Tai Shao
Defendant / Appellee: John G. Roberts, Chief Justice, Anthony M. Kennedy, Associate Justice, Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice and others
Yi Tai Shao v. John Roberts, et al
as 19-5014
Defendant / Appellee: United States Supreme Court, Rice Pichon, BJ Fadem and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Yi Tai Shao, Esquire, Attorney and Yi Tai Shao
ZHANG v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2015cv00819
Defendant: JEH CHARLES JOHNSON , LEON RODRIGUEZ and SARAH TAYLOR
Plaintiff: YUE YI ZHANG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. CHIANG et al
as 1:2007cv00285
Plaintiff: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant: DANIEL FONGNIEN CHIANG and EVA YI-FEN CHEN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Hwang, Geum Joo, et al v. Japan We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 01-7169
Plaintiff - Appellant: Geum Joo Hwang, Yuan Zhulin, Lola Tomasa Salinog and others
Defendant - Appellee: Japan, Minister Yohei Kono, Minister of Foreign Affairs
Amicus Curiae For Appellant: Washington Coalition for Comfort Women Issues, Inc., New York Coalition on Comfort Women Issues, Kelly Askin, Professor and others
Amicus Curiae For Appellee: United States of America

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?