Cases 11 - 20 of 107
CHAND et al v. MTN IRANCELL TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES COMPANY
as 1:2022cv00830
Plaintiff:
SALLY CHAND, MICHAEL CHAND, JR., CHRISTINA MAHON and others
Defendant:
MTN GROUP LIMITED, MTN IRANCELL TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES COMPANY, PHUTHUMA NHLEKO and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2331 Anti-terrorism Act
TABRON et al v. TRUMP
as 1:2022cv00011
Plaintiff:
BOBBY TABRON and DEDIVINE K. CARTER
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ARGUETA-ZUNIGA v. KEBEDE
as 1:2021cv03200
Plaintiff:
MILTON ARGUETA-ZUNIGA
Defendant:
TESHAGER KEBEDE and TESHAGER K. KEBEDE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PIRRELLO v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2021cv01956
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
LYNNE K. PIRRELLO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2021cv01308
Plaintiff:
E. F., ROBERT A CHAPMAN, OREN D. GINGRICH and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
PATEL v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2021cv01076
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN, EMORY UNIVERSITY, UNITED STATES and others
Plaintiff:
RAJ K. PATEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
KLAYMAN v. KAISER et al
as 1:2021cv00965
Defendant:
MATTHEW KAISER, JULIA PORTER, HAMILTON FOX, III and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY ELLIOT KLAYMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
KLAYMAN v. KAISER et al
as 1:2021cv00727
Defendant:
MATTHEW KAISER, HAMILTON FOX, III, JULIA PORTER and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY KLAYMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KLAYMAN v. PORTER et al
as 1:2020cv03579
Defendant:
JULIA PORTER, HAMILTON FOX, III and LAWRENCE K. BLOOM
Plaintiff:
LARRY E. KLAYMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MONTGOMERY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2020cv03437
Defendant:
PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
TERESA K. MONTGOMERY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
