Cases 21 - 30 of 95
ROBERTS et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2020cv01227
Plaintiff:
HAMID MUGHAL, M.R., NATASHA GROVE and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
ACKLEY et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2020cv00621
Plaintiff:
MARSHALL L. BENEWAY, ANDREW K. CROFT, CRAIG J. DICK and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
SMITH v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2019cv02952
Plaintiff:
ROBIN SMITH
Defendant:
PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WMATA v. SMITH
as 1:2019cv02895
Plaintiff:
WMATA and WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Defendant:
TRACY HEINZMAN SMITH and TRACY SMITH
HAMMONS et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2019cv02518
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY BUSBY, ANDRIA HARRIS, TASHIA EVANS and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
SMITH v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2019cv02504
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL
Plaintiff:
EARNESTINE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 1:2019cv02079
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
WILLIE RUTH SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RUSS-GREEN v. SMITH et al
as 1:2019cv01780
Defendant:
LEVEL ONE TRUCKING, LLC and TIMOTHY LORNE SMITH
Plaintiff:
NATALIE RUSS-GREEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH-FERRELL v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2019cv01536
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON, PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL and others
Plaintiff:
JANET SMITH-FERRELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2019cv01513
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON, PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL and others
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
