Cases 1 - 10 of 14
LASSITER v. YOUNG et al
as 1:2022cv02567
Plaintiff:
DUSKIN CORBAN LASSITER
Defendant:
TODD YOUNG, JOHN BARRASSO, MARSH BLACKBURN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
CORTEZ v. BASKIN
as 1:2020cv00073
Defendant:
MARYPAT WRIGHT, PHILADELPHIA FAMILY COURT OF PHILADELPHIA, NATHAN NOLAN EDWARDS and others
Plaintiff:
DARLENE CORTEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CANUTO v. PELOSI et al
as 1:2019cv01791
Plaintiff:
TERESITA A. CANUTO
Defendant:
HAKEEM JEFFRIES, NANCY PELOSI, LIS CHENEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
CORTEZ v. BASKIN et al
as 1:2019cv00628
Defendant:
FOOTE AND JENKS, EDEN ESSENTIALS, STEVE SIKER and others
Plaintiff:
DARLENE CORTEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCPHERSON v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2018cv02297
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey McPherson
Defendant:
WMATA, Steve Faison and WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HAKE et al v. BANK MARKAZI JOMHOURI ISLAMI IRAN et al
as 1:2017cv00114
Plaintiff:
KELLI D. HAKE , DENISE YORK , RUSSEL YORK and others
Defendant:
BANK MARKAZI JOMHOURI ISLAMI IRAN, BANK MELLI IRAN, MELLI BANK PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
RAMDEEN v. WMATA
as 1:2016cv00341
Defendant:
WMATA
Plaintiff:
STEVE RAMDEEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KARCHER et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2016cv00232
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Plaintiff:
KARCHER, ERIKA NEUMAN, LINDA JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1602
BAKER v. GIPE et al
as 1:2014cv01483
Plaintiff:
GILBERT BAKER, JR.
Defendant:
BRUCE P. GIPE, R. S. BURKE, K. PFANZELTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
BARNUM v. ZOMBRO et al
as 1:2013cv00364
Plaintiff:
CASSANDRA JANE BARNUM
Defendant:
JOHN ZOMBRO , SKYHAWK LOGISTICS, INC. and STEVE W. BARRETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
