Cases 31 - 40 of 40
MOSES et al v. SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC.
as 1:2011cv00822
Plaintiff:
ARCHIE MOSES and VIOLET M. MOSES
Defendant:
SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
STOVELL v. JAMES et al
as 1:2010cv01059
Plaintiff:
LEICESTER BRYCE STOVELL
Defendant:
GLORIA M. JAMES and LEBRON R. JAMES, SR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MASOUD v. SULIMAN et al
as 1:2010cv00994
Plaintiff:
ASHRAF M. MASOUD
Defendant:
MOHAMMAD SULIMAN and DAR-AL TANMIYAH EST. FOR TRADING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CROWDER v. BIERMAN et al
as 1:2010cv00104
Petitioner:
VALDA R. CROWDER
Respondent:
HOWARD BIERMAN, JACOB GEESING, CARRIE M. WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
MASOUD v. DAR-AL TANMIYAH EST. FOR TRADING
as 1:2009cv02128
Plaintiff:
ASHRAF M. MASOUD
Defendant:
DAR-AL TANMIYAH EST. FOR TRADING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
TRAVERS v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. et al
as 1:2009cv01061
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY M. TRAVERS
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., WORLD SAVINGS BANK, FSB, WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, FSB and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
FAY v. PATTON BOGGS LLP et al
as 1:2008cv00878
Plaintiff:
THOMAS FORTUNE FAY
Defendant:
PATTON BOGGS LLP and STEVEN M. SCHNEEBAUM
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HERRICK v. MAGUIRE
as 1:2007cv01675
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DUNCAN HERRICK
Defendant:
STEVEN M. MAGUIRE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
CARROLL et al v. ANYLOAN COMPANY et al
as 1:2007cv00018
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CARROLL and MONICA CARROLL
Defendant:
ANYLOAN COMPANY, NEW CENTURY MORTGAGE CORPORATION, NEW CENTURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Labovitz, Peter C., et al v. WA Times Corp, et al
as 97-7203
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Peter C. Labovitz and Sharon M. Labovitz
Defendant - Appellee:
The Washington Times Corporation and News World Communications, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
