Cases 41 - 50 of 85
Jay Mellen v. United States Park Police, et al
as 15-5328
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jay Mellen
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Park Police, Robert Maclean, Park Police Chief; in official and private positions, Sally Jewell, Secretary; in official and private positions and others
JACKSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2015cv02035
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
GAYLE NIX JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MELLEN v. UNITED STATES PARK POLICE
as 1:2015cv01581
Plaintiff:
JAY MELLEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PARK POLICE , ROBERT MACLEAN , SALLY JEWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
SMITH v UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2014cv00959
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BRUMMER v. HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES INC et al
as 1:2014cv00573
Movant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
CRAIG S. BRUMMER
Defendant:
HEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC. , MONROE HMA LLC , WINDER HMA LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
TOREN v. FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY et al
as 1:2014cv00359
Plaintiff:
DAVID TOREN
Defendant:
FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY and FREE STATE OF BAVARIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1602
HARDAWAY v. CROSS STATE MOVING et al
as 1:2014cv00405
Plaintiff:
LENA HARDAWAY
Defendant:
CROSS STATE MOVING and SHLOMO DOSTEKAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RATLEY v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 1:2013cv00756
Plaintiff:
LON RATLEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
LITTLE v. UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
as 1:2013cv00379
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
USA v. Project on Government Oversigh
as 13-5037
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellee:
Project on Government Oversight
Defendant - Appellant:
Robert A. Berman
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
